Sept. 29, 2008
Gadsden judge: Bring the absentees to me on Oct. 7 By Scott Wright GADSDEN — Defendants
and their legal teams drove 30 miles to Gadsden Monday, hoping to see a
lawsuit over suspicious absentee ballots in Cedar Bluff get knocked out of
court for good. Instead, they and the plaintiffs will be back next week for
round two. There won’t be a
runoff election in Cedar Bluff on Oct. 7, either. Etowah County
Circuit Judge William H. Rhea III ultimately declined several candidates’ motions
to dismiss the lawsuit on a technicality over filing procedures. He then set
a hearing for Oct. 7 at 9 a.m. in his courtroom to examine over two dozen
absentee ballots that plaintiffs contend were cast illegally.
Mayoral candidate
Jimmy Wallace, along with town council candidates Billie Burkhalter and
Lenora McWhorter, filed suit against the town of Cedar Bluff and their
opponents within days of the town’s Aug. 28 municipal election. According
to their suit, former Cedar Bluff Town Clerk Mary Shaner, who currently
works as a secretary for District 1 candidate Evan Smith, and Glenda Smith,
the candidate's wife, witnessed multiple ballots. Becky Sanders, wife of
District 2 candidate Donald Sanders, also handled over a dozen absentee
ballots in the weeks before the election.
There were also a lopsided number absentee votes cast for Steve Lay, a
candidate for mayor, the suit charges. The plaintiffs
contend that if the 27 votes they consider illegal are thrown out,
Burkhalter would win her District 1 race. As the vote count stands now, she
will face Smith in a runoff. Smith received all eight of the absentee votes
cast in District 1. In District 2,
McWhorter and Sanders are scheduled to face off. The 15 absentee votes
Sanders received gave him a nine-vote edge over McWhorter (43-34), who only
received three absentee votes. If the challenged ballots are disallowed,
McWhorter would win the council seat by three votes (31-28). In the race for
mayor, Lay and Ethel Sprouse are set to face each other in the runoff. With
the absentee votes removed, however, Wallace would move into second place by
three votes. Early on in the
hearing, Rhea told lawyers representing both sides that the meeting would be
a “scheduling hearing” only. “There will be no
rulings today,” he said. Judge Rhea then peppered attorneys for the plaintiffs and the several defendants, all of whom, with the exception of Steve Lay, were present in the second-floor courtroom. On Friday afternoon,
Rhea
listened as attorneys for Smith and Sanders insisted their clients had never
been properly served with court papers. “There is nothing more to be done than dismissal,” said Ralph Strawn, on behalf of Smith. Centre attorney Al Shumaker, representing Sprouse, then rose to argue that state law requires that a "winner" be declared before an election challenge could proceed. As directed by the
judge, Shane Givens, attorney for the plaintiffs, disputed each charge in
turn and also
counter-argued for his clients’ positions. Bill Hawkins, who
represents the town of “We’re just here for
guidance from the court on how to proceed with the runoff election,” Hawkins
said. After hearing 30 minutes of arguments from both sides, Judge Rhea called for a five-minute recess. He returned with his court reporter in tow and he asked each attorney to repeat everything they’d already told him, this time for the record.
After another
half-hour, Rhea sat forward in his chair, casually denied the defendants'
motions to dismiss the suit, and ordered Cedar Bluff Town Clerk DeLana
Martin to bring the sealed box of absentee ballots to his courtroom next
week. “I’ll see everyone next Tuesday at 9 a.m.,” the judge said. “We’ll go from there.” An attorney involved in the case informed The Post Monday morning that the hearing scheduled for Tuesday may be postponed for a few days because of Lay's death. |