Sept. 8, 2010
Judge tosses reprimands, denies damage claims By Scott Wright
CENTRE —
Two teachers in
the Circuit Judge Randall L. Cole ruled that because of a
violation of the state’s Open Meetings Act by Johnson and the Board members,
letters of reprimand placed in the files of the two teachers – Cherokee
County Career and Technology Center Principal Mitchell Guice and Gaylesville
teacher Brett Keasler – be “voided and held for naught.” Cole also threw out claims by Guice and Keasler for
unspecified monetary damages based on charges of defamation and breach of
contract. According to Judge Cole’s 11-page order, which was filed
in the office of Circuit Clerk Dwayne Amos on Aug. 25, the lawsuit
originated earlier this summer after Johnson moved to reprimand Guice and
Keasler for allegedly lying under oath at a public hearing to discuss the
transfer of another teacher. However, Cole ruled that proper procedures were not
followed before the subsequent letters of reprimand were voted on and placed
in Guice’s and Keasler’s permanent employment files. According to the judge’s order, Johnson informed Guice
and Keasler on July 13, 2010 that they were to report to his office the
following day for a Board meeting. When asked the purposed of the meeting,
Johnson was noncommittal.
When Guice and Keasler learned the following morning that
they were being called before the Board to be reprimanded for lying under
oath, Keasler went so far as to seek a continuance of the meeting until he
could obtain legal counsel. His request was denied. In their lawsuit against Johnson and the Board, Guice and
Keasler challenged that the Board’s failure to inform them of the purpose of
the July 14 meeting, or to list an agenda or statement of purpose on a
posted announcement of the meeting, violated the Open Meetings Act. Cole agreed, ruling there was ample evidence to prove
that Johnson, acting on behalf of the Board, “disregarded the notice
provisions” of the Open Meetings Act. Specifically, Cole ruled, the Board’s secretary was aware
of the purpose of the meeting, but “she did not prepare an agenda because
she did not know how to list the reprimands.” When she made Johnson aware of
her uncertainty, Cole continued, “[Johnson] gave his approval and made no
suggestion that she correct the omission.” Keasler told The Post he is happy with the outcome of the
case. “I would like the people of Cherokee County to know that
I never gave a false testimony as accused by the superintendent and I feel
that Judge Cole’s decision is a step in the right direction of restoring me
and my family,” Keasler said.
Guice and Keasler also sought monetary damages, both from
the Board as an entity, and from Johnson and all the members of the Board
“in their official and individual capacities”. But Cole determined the accusations were unfounded and
granted summary judgment to the defendants, ending the suit before it could
reach the courtroom. “Mr. Guice and Mr. Keasler tried very hard to get the
court to impose damages out of the individual pockets of the superintendent
and board members,” read a statement released by Johnson on
Sept. 8. “Fortunately, although the court set aside the reprimands, it also
dismissed [their] claims for damages. In fact, the court said ‘there is no
genuine issue of material fact to support such claims’.”
|